Hamlets Destructive Humor Essay -- GCSE English Literature Coursework

Hamlets Destructive Humor Humor can be playfulnessny and lift up or cynical and destructive. Hamlets humor insults every one around him and its very cynical and leads to his downfall. When Hamlet insults people around him, his remarks are not clearly unsounded by the people who he is insulting. Hamlet makes Polonius look like a fool when he criticizes him with his words, and Polonius doesnt know that he is being fooled. Hamlet even makes recreation of the courtiers particularly Rosencrantz and Guildernstern. Although Hamlet doesnt stop there, he even insults Claudius and his own m separate, Gertrude. Hamlets love, Ophelia, is also an unfortunate victim of these remarks. All these insulting remarks show Hamlets lack of sympathy for other(a) people, and this confusion leads to his downfall. When Hamlet feigns madness, Polonius is the most unfortunate victim of Hamlets insulting and humorous words. When Polonius asks Hamlet, Do you know me my lord? (2.2.173) Hamlet replies by saying, Excellent well. You are a fishmonger. (2.2.174). Hamlet says that, Polonius is sacrificing his daughters happiness to win the trust of the king. Hamlet says to Polonius, For if the sun breed maggots in a dead dog, being a good kissing carrion-Have you a daughter? (2.2.182-183). Hamlet says that it is not surprising that Polonius is such a hypocrite, because the life giving sun can produce all kinds of horrible things, especially from other horrible things. Polonius asks Hamlet, Will you walk out of the air, my lord?(2.2.204), and Hamlets says, Into my grave (2.2.204). When Polonius offers Hamlet to go to a warmer room, Hamlet says hed rather die than go anyplace with Polonius. All these insulting remarks show that Polon... ... Hamlets humor is rude and insulting to people around him its very cynical and leads to his downfall. Hamlet proves his cynical humor when he fools Polonius, makes fun of the courtiers and insults Claudius, Gertrude and Ophelia. Hamlet insults Polonius with his words and always finds out what the courtiers were up to. All these experiences show that humor can be joyful but on the other plenty it could prove to be very fatal. Works Cited and Consulted Bloom, Harold. Modern Critical Interpretations Of Hamlet. New York, NY Chelsea House Publishers, 1986. Brodwin, Leonora. Hamlet Character Analysis. Monarch Notes. Brodwins Notes Scott-Hopkins, Benjamin. Dark Humor of Hamlet Shakespeare-Online Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. The uncut William Shakespeare. William George Clark and William Aldis Wright, ed. Running Press. 1989.

International Relations Essays -- Literary Analysis, Realism, Neo-Real

The first look-alike of planetary relations is the theory of Realism. Realism is foc intentd on ideas of self-interest and the balance of power. Realism is alike divided into two categories, classical realism and neo-realism. known political theorist, Hans Morgenthau was a classical realist who believed that national interest was based on three elements, balance of power, military force, and self interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He uses four levels of abbreviation to evaluate the power of a state. The first is that power and influence are not always the aforesaid(prenominal) thing. Influence means the ability to affect the finding of those who have the power to date outcomes and power is the ability to determine outcomes. An sample of influence and power would be the UNs ability to influence the actions of states at bottom the UN plainly the state itself has the power to determine how they act. Morgenthau goes on to his next level of analysis in which he explains the vari ation in force and power in the world(prenominal) realm. Force is physical violence, the use of military power but power is so much more than than that. A powerful state can control the actions of another(prenominal) state with the threat of force but not actually need to physical force. He believed that the ability to have power over another state simply with the threat of force was likely to be the most important element in analysis the power of as state (Kleinberg 2010, 33-34). Morgenthau goes onto his triad method of analysis which is reviewing a states usable and unusable power. The most popular example of this is the possession of nuclear weaponry. Nuclear capabilities and that threat of their use is a form of useable power for states like the US and Russia but not for states with underdeveloped nu... ...th 2001). Roth argues that the fancy of international jurisdiction is not a reinvigorated idea but was exercised by the US government in the 1970 after an aircraft hijac king. Also the war curse courts established after the end of World fight II exercised international jurisdiction. In fact the Geneva Convention states that is a person regardless of their nationality should be brought before the court of any state in which that person has committed grave breaches of law and convention. Roth states that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a freshly one but that only in new-fashioned years have states been willing to act on universal jurisdiction and go after criminals of the international community regardless of their stating or power within the international community. Roth believes in the ability and authority of international organizations and institutions (Roth 2001). International Relations Essays -- Literary Analysis, Realism, Neo-RealThe first paradigm of international relations is the theory of Realism. Realism is focused on ideas of self-interest and the balance of power. Realism is also divided into two cate gories, classical realism and neo-realism. Famous political theorist, Hans Morgenthau was a classical realist who believed that national interest was based on three elements, balance of power, military force, and self interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He uses four levels of analysis to evaluate the power of a state. The first is that power and influence are not always the same thing. Influence means the ability to affect the decision of those who have the power to control outcomes and power is the ability to determine outcomes. An example of influence and power would be the UNs ability to influence the actions of states within the UN but the state itself has the power to determine how they act. Morgenthau goes on to his next level of analysis in which he explains the difference in force and power in the international realm. Force is physical violence, the use of military power but power is so much more than that. A powerful state can control the actions of another state with the threa t of force but not actually need to physical force. He believed that the ability to have power over another state simply with the threat of force was likely to be the most important element in analysis the power of as state (Kleinberg 2010, 33-34). Morgenthau goes onto his third method of analysis which is reviewing a states usable and unusable power. The most popular example of this is the possession of nuclear weaponry. Nuclear capabilities and that threat of their use is a form of useable power for states like the US and Russia but not for states with underdeveloped nu... ...th 2001). Roth argues that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new idea but was exercised by the US government in the 1970 after an aircraft hijacking. Also the war crime courts established after the end of World War II exercised international jurisdiction. In fact the Geneva Convention states that is a person regardless of their nationality should be brought before the court of any state in w hich that person has committed grave breaches of law and convention. Roth states that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new one but that only in recent years have states been willing to act on universal jurisdiction and go after criminals of the international community regardless of their stating or power within the international community. Roth believes in the ability and authority of international organizations and institutions (Roth 2001).